top of page

NEWS

Latest Insights

News

12-18-2014

Apostilles and Certificates of Authority

Sometimes when a notarial act is performed involving a document that is headed to another state or a foreign country, the receiving state or country requires a "certificate of authority" from the notary's commissioning authority. This official document authenticates the notary's authority, stating that the notary was duly commissioned on the date of the notarial act. When the document in question is headed to certain foreign countries, the certificate of authority takes a different form called an "apostille."

 

It is not your responsibility to obtain apostilles or certificates of authority, but you should be familiar with the process in order to be a good source of information to your clients.

 

Commissioning Authority—The governmental authority that commissioned you as a notary is the resource for a certificate of authority or apostille. Depending on the state, the commissioning authority can be the Secretary of State, Governor, Lt. Governor, individual County Probate Judge, Clerk of Superior Court, Superior Court Assistant Judge, Attorney General, or the Department of Licensing. (In the District of Columbia, it's the Mayor.)

 

The Process—Requests for a certificate of authority or apostille must be made in writing, and delivered to the notary's commissioning authority by mail or in person. The letter should explain why the certificate of authority or apostille is needed, and where the document is headed. A postage-paid, return envelope with either the address of the document custodian, or the address of the document's final destination, should be included. There is generally a processing fee that varies by state. The original document bearing the notary's completed notarial certificate must also be presented with the written request and fee.

 

Depending on where the document is headed overseas, your commissioning authority will know whether a certificate of authority or apostille is needed and will generate the correct document.

 

The commissioning authority will then verify the notary's signature and commission details against the official record. (For example, does the notary's signature on the notarial certificate match the sample on file? Was the notary's commission in effect and not expired on the date of the notarial act?)

 

If all is in order, the commissioning authority then completes a written certificate of authority, affixes an official seal, attaches the certificate to the document, and returns the document to the document custodian. Or, the document and certificate of authority may be sent to its final destination if the return envelope (submitted by the document custodian) displays the proper address.

 

In addition, some foreign countries may require federal authentication from the Department of State's Authentication Office in Washington, D.C. For federal authentication, the document custodian must submit the original, notarized document with its state certificate of authority, a letter stating why federal authentication is needed, and where the document is headed overseas. There is a $7 per document fee, payable by personal check or money order to U.S. Department of State (Visa or Mastercard accepted from walk-ins only).

 

Apostilles—For years, documents headed to foreign countries had to go through a multi-step process of "legalisation"-i.e., authentication-in order to be delivered to the intended foreign country. This remains true for some countries. In 1961, however, a number of countries including the United States entered into a treaty called the "Hague Convention Abolishing The Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents" which greatly simplifies the authentication process.

 

Countries that signed this particular treaty agreed on a streamlined process of document "legalisation," and on a standardized certificate of authentication called an "Apostille." The treaty specifies the exact physical details of the apostille: it must be in the form of a square with sides at least nine centimeters long; and it must contain the exact wording set forth in the treaty. Your commissioning authority uses the apostille form for authenticating a notary's authority, when the related document is headed to a country that signed the Hague treaty.

 

Only countries that signed this particular Hague Convention may utilize the apostille, and only those countries enjoy the streamlined authentication process afforded by use of the apostille. Note: an apostille is not used when a document is going from one state in the U.S. to another U.S. state-a certificate of authority is used instead.

 

As stated earlier in this article, the process for obtaining an apostille is the same as for obtaining a certificate of authority. Your commissioning authority will know which form is appropriate, based on the destination of the document.

 

To review who your commissioning authority is, and where to write (or walk-in) for a certificate of authority/apostille, remember to visit ASN's web site, www.asnnotary.org. Click on "Notary Information by State" in the left-hand margin, then select your state.

 

 

12-10-2014

Conflict of Interest    

The Situation:  A notary has been asked to perform a notarial act involving a document that the notary must also sign as a party to the transaction. The signer’s execution (signing) of the document requires an acknowledgment, but the notary’s, as a named party, does not.

The Notary’s Dilemma:  Can the notary proceed with notarization involving a document that he will also sign as a named party?

The Solution:  The above situation would create a conflict of interest for the notary and he should not perform the requested notarial act.

Notary laws provide certain prohibitions against conflicts of interest. The purpose of these laws is to protect the public. In performing your duties, it is essential that you act with total impartiality. You must be an unbiased, disinterested party who stands between the signer and anyone who would defraud that signer. That means, when performing a notarial act, you cannot have any conflict of interest, including being a party to the transaction or gaining financially or materially from the transaction.

NAMED PARTY CONFLICT
Oregon notary law, for example, specifically forbids notaries from performing notarial acts involving a transaction to which the notary is a party:

Oregon Revised Statutes 194.158 Prohibited acts:
(1) A notary public may not perform a notarial act if the notary is a signer of or named in the document that is to be notarized. Michigan’s notary statutes carry a similar prohibition:

Michigan Notary Public Act, Section 55.291:
(7) A notary public shall not perform any notarial act in connection with a transaction if the notary public has a conflict of interest. As used in this subsection, “conflict of interest” means either or both of the following:
(a) The notary public has a direct financial or beneficial interest, other than the notary public fee, in the transaction.
(b) The notary public is named, individually, as a grantor, grantee, mortgagor, mortgagee, trustor, trustee, beneficiary, vendor, vendee, lessor, or lessee or as a party in some other capacity to the transaction.

FINANCIAL GAIN CONFLICT
Clearly, you cannot be impartial if you stand to gain financially from a transaction, even if you are neither a party to nor named in the documents related to the transaction. For example, if you receive a commission or bonus if the transaction is successfully executed, you are not an impartial observer and must not be the notary for the transaction. (A financial benefit would not include your fee for the notarial service, nor would it include your salary as an employee.)

MATERIAL GAIN CONFLICT
When deciding whether or not you should perform a notarial act, it is sometimes harder to envision a benefit that is not expressed in dollars and cents.

An ASN member who was a notary for a church called to ask if she could notarize for her pastor on documents establishing a school at the church. As it happened, with the establishment of the school the notary would gain the use of an automobile that would be purchased by the school. We told her that the use of the automobile constituted a material gain and meant that she should not be the notary for documents related to the establishment of the school because she would not be considered impartial.

NOTARIZING FOR FAMILY
Another conflict of interest is notarizing for family members. Some states’ notary laws do not specifically address notarizing for relatives, while other states have very specific statutes that prohibit the notary from officiating for certain family members (usually spouse, children, siblings and parents). A notary public must be an impartial witness, and best practice would dictate that the notary not notarize for a person related by birth, marriage or adoption.

 

11-22-2014

Identification by Credible Witness

Credible Witness Affidavit
The credible witness affidavit as a means of identification is for the client who is not personally known to the notary, has no form of identification and cannot be reasonably expected to obtain an acceptable ID card. These clients are frequently elderly people who live in a nursing home environment and have mobility issues. They haven’t driven a car in years, and it would be unreasonable to expect the person to be taken to the Department of Motor Vehicles to obtain a non-driver’s identity card.  Certain handicapped people may also fall into this category. Use your judgment when deciding if your client is eligible for identification by credible witness.

A credible witness or witnesses may NOT be used to identify a client for the sake of convenience. If the able-bodied client has let his driver’s license expire, he must obtain a current license. If someone has left his ID card at home, he must return home and get the existing ID card. In addition, keep in mind that since the credible witness(es) will serve as positive identification for the document signer, the credible witness(es) sworn affidavit must be obtained before performance of the notarial act for the document signer.

Our discussion of the process for using a credible witness(es) will be general in nature. Read your state’s statutes regarding the use of credible witness(es) before attempting to use this method of identifying a client.

One Credible Witness
All states that allow the notary to use one credible witness have the requirement that the credible witness must personally know the signer of the document, and the notary must personally know the credible witness. The purpose of this requirement is to maintain a chain of personal knowledge from the signer through the credible witness to the notary.

The credible witness will sign an affidavit stating that:

1.  The person appearing before the notary is personally known to the credible witness and is the person whose name appears on the document in question.
2.  The credible witness reasonably believes that the document signer does not possess an acceptable form of identification.
3.  The credible witness reasonably believes that the circumstances of the document signer are such that obtaining an acceptable form of identification would be very difficult or impossible.
4.  The credible witness does not have a financial interest in nor is a party to the transaction.

Upon signing the affidavit, the signer will swear an oath or affirmation to the notary that the contents of the affidavit are true. The notary may verbalize the short form of oath/affirmation (“Do you swear/affirm the contents of this document are true [so help you God]?”). Or, the notary may verbalize this more specific oath/affirmation:

“Do you solemnly (swear) (affirm) under penalties of perjury that you personally know this person as (name of person whose signature is to be notarized), that he/she is the person named in the document, that you believe that the person has no acceptable form of identification, that it would be very difficult or impossible for him/her to obtain acceptable identification, and that you have no financial interest in and are not a party to this transaction (so help you God)?”

If you receive an affirmative verbal reply to the oath or affirmation shown above, complete the Credible Witness Affidavit form by filling in the jurat section. Attach the Credible Witness Affidavit to the document and indicate on the notarial certificate on the document that identification was made through a Credible Witness Affidavit. Have the credible witness sign and print his name, address and phone number in a separate recordbook entry  for the notarial act of completing the Credible Witness Affidavit. In the space for additional information or comments write:

“This entry is related to entry #XXX…,”

the recordbook entry for the notarial act performed over the original document. In the space reserved for additional information or comments in the recordbook entry for the notarial act performed over the original document write:

“Signer positively identified through credible witness affidavit; please see entry #XXX.”

Two Credible Witnesses
There are ONLY eight states that permit the use of two credible witnesses. They are California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Mexico and Virginia. Both credible witnesses must personally know the document signer and possess an acceptable identification document to present to the notary for positive identification. When two credible witnesses are used, they both complete the credible witness affidavit, sign it and print their names under their signatures. The notary administers a verbal oath/affirmation to both witnesses, then completes the jurat section of the affidavit. The notary enters the type of identification document each credible witness presented on the Credible Witness Affidavit. Because of an increasing number of incidents of identity theft, notaries are advised not to write the serial number of the ID card on the notarial certificate. Notaries in a few states are prohibited from recording ID serial numbers.

Have the two witnesses sign and print their names, addresses and phone numbers in a separate recordbook entry for the notarial act of completing the Credible Witness Affidavit. Write into that recordbook entry the type of identification document that was produced by each credible witness (Remember NOT to record serial numbers). In the space for additional information or comments write:

“This entry is related to entry #XXX…,”

the recordbook entry for the notarial act performed over the original document. In the space reserved for additional information or comments in the recordbook entry for the notarial act performed over the original document write:

“Signer positively identified through credible witness affidavit; please see entry #XXX.”

 

1-7-2015

Declining to Perform a Notarial Act

Under what circumstances may I decline to perform a notarial act for a client?

A notary is, first and foremost, a public officer. He must be prepared and willing to carry out his duties for a client who requests a notarial act that is authorized by the state in which he is commissioned, if all elements for performing the notarial act are in place.

The following is a list of common reasons or situations that may cause a notary to decline to perform a notarial act. It is not an exhaustive list. No list can contain all the situations in which a notary might find himself.

You may decline to perform a notarial act if:

•  The notary believes that the transaction is fraudulent in some way.
•  The document is not eligible to have a notarial act performed over it, i.e.
    → The notary has not been given all the pages of the document.
    → There are blank spaces in the document that appear to be germane to the signer’s understanding of the document, and the signer doesn’t know what information belongs in these spaces.
    → The date on the document is later than the date that the notarial act would take place.
•  The client appears to be confused.
•  The client does not understand the contents of the document well enough to execute the document by signing it.
•  The signer is apparently being coerced to sign a document that she does not want to sign.
•  The document signer does not have identification as required by state law.
•  The notary believes that the person standing before him is not the person whose name is on the document.
•  The client has come to the notary at his place of employment with a document for a type of transaction that the notary’s employer has instructed him not to consider for a notarial act.
•  The notary is not authorized by state law to perform the requested notarial act.
•  The client’s request is not a notarial act at all.
•  The client refuses to pay the notary’s authorized fee for performing a notarial act.
•  There is someone else present who appears to have some sort of control over the signer.
•  The client wants the notary to travel to perform the notarial act, and the notary is not a “mobile notary.”

Don’t guess at what you should or should not do when faced with an unusual situation. Don’t take the advice of the client or another notary who works with you. These people may mean well, but they also may give you incorrect information. If you are uncertain whether you should proceed with a notarial act, call ASN—We’re here for you!

 

 

1-5-2015

Understanding Your Notary Bond (Surety) & Errors and Omissions Insurance

The Situation:  We received a call from a notary who was concerned that she may be sued as a result of an incorrectly performed notarial act.

The Notary’s Dilemma:  She was afraid that her state-required notary bond would not cover her legal expenses and any judgment against her.

The Solution:  Many states require that a notary public be bonded throughout the term of his or her commission. Obtaining the surety bond is a part of the application or renewal process. Although the surety bond is similar to an insurance product, it does not protect the notary. The bond is meant to compensate others who have suffered a loss due to an improper notarial act having been performed by a notary. The notary cannot make a claim against the bond for herself.

When a bond company issues a bond to a notary, it is saying, “We warrant that Jane Doe Notary will perform her duties in accordance with the law. If she does not and there is a loss, we will pay the victim for that loss up to the limits of the bond.” Bond limits are determined by state law and therefore vary by state. Limits range from a low of $500 to a high of $15,000. If the bond agent has to pay out all or a part of the notary’s bond, the notary will be required to repay the bond agent the amount of the expended portion of the bond.

What can the notary do to limit the impact of a lawsuit resulting from an honest mistake? The answer lies in obtaining an errors and omissions (E&O) insurance policy. This insurance is widely available and very affordable for the limits of protection it provides.

Errors and omissions insurance covers a notary policy holder who may be sued by someone who believes that an improperly performed notarial act by the policy holder caused that person to suffer a monetary loss or denial of some benefit.

What coverage limits should a notary carry on an E&O policy? We suggest you consider the monetary value of the transactions you generally preside over, and shop accordingly. Notaries who preside over transactions valued in the hundreds of thousands of dollars (the average home loan closing), for example, purchase coverage more in sync with these dollar amounts.

Remember, too, that E&O insurance designed specifically for notary signing agents is now available in addition to standard E&O coverage. (For more information on signing agent E&O coverage, please visit www.signingagentinsurance.com or http://signingagent.cnasurety.com).

If you are commissioned in a state that requires a bond, then your surety bond agent is your most likely resource for E&O insurance. Otherwise, a simple web search will yield a number of resources for this valuable coverage.

 

 

1-2-2015

Verify Before You Act!

Today’s notarial tip comes to us courtesy of a member who faced a challenging situation last week:  how to proceed when the signer would be signing by mark.

The Situation:
The very elderly signer could no longer grasp a pen or pencil well enough to sign with her traditional signature “scrawl.”  She could, however, make a mark (such as an “X”).  The signer would be executing a number of prepared documents, and our notary member was asked to officiate at the signer’s home.

The Notary’s Dilemma: 
Upon scanning the documents presented for notarization, the notary discovered the document preparer’s very explicit instructions to the notary for how to carry out a signature-by-mark signing.  These instructions seemed to be reasonable and the notary initially thought following them might be wise, in order to satisfy the wishes of the relying parties and avoid the risk of document rejection.  He wondered if he should just “go along to get along.”

The Solution:
On further thought, the notary (just one week into his new membership with ASN!) decided he should call us to verify whether the document preparer’s instructions for the signature-by-mark signing were acceptable.

They were not.  The document preparer’s instructions for a signature-by-mark signing conflicted with the notary’s state laws and rules.  As we counseled our member, notaries should always check their state statutes and rules for specific guidance on how the notary must perform in certain types of transactions.  Don’t blindly act on instructions without verifying them.

For example, it is not at all uncommon for notary statutes to provide explicit procedures for a signature-by-mark signing.  Document preparers unfamiliar with notary law may not know this, but notaries themselves should.  Our member notary learned that, contrary to the instructions provided by the document preparer, the signer would have to affix her mark in his presence (even though the notarial act was an acknowledgment), two witnesses instead of one would be required, and the witnesses could not be affected by the transaction (calling into question the document preparer’s expectation that family members could serve as witnesses).  Furthermore, the notary’s statutes required him to write very specific information underneath the signer’s mark, such as the names and addresses of the witnesses.  These and other details were simply not provided in the document preparer’s instructions.

Had the notary simply elected to “go along to get along,” he would have failed in his duty to perform in strict compliance with state statutes and rules.  Instead, our member explained to the signer why he could not proceed, and inspired trust through his tact and professionalism. 

In Conclusion:
Never simply assume that instructions given by document preparers to the notary are “okay”—they might conflict with your statutes or rules.  When faced with an unusual or challenging notarization, or when given instructions on how to proceed, check your state laws and rules to see if they provide guidance.  Always verify that the actions you plan to take will comply.  When in doubt, don’t guess… call ASN for assistance!

12-31-2014

Housing in 2015: ‘We Are in a Slow March Back to Normal’

The thump of air hammers and the whine of mini-dozers will be heard a bit more in 2015. Housing construction should continue to climb back in the new year, although it probably won’t get all the way back to its long-run average. “We are in a slow march back to normal,” David Crowe, chief economist with the National Association of Home Builders, said in a December statement.

“Before this downturn, anything below 1 million housing starts in a year was considered almost a housing depression,” Stuart Miller, chief executive at Lennar(LEN), said in a September conference call with analysts. “This recovery is just now getting us back to that level of starts.” The homebuilders’ group projects housing starts to grow from just under 1 million in 2014 to about 1.2 million in 2015.

Peter Coy / Businessweek / December 31st, 2014

Housing isn’t staging a more vigorous recovery because for every plus, there’s a minus. Mortgage rates are low, but lending standards remain extremely tough. Rising home prices are gladdening the hearts of homeowners, but they’re making it hard for first-time buyers to break into the market. The economy is getting stronger, which helps buyers, but it also raises the cost of labor and materials. And if the economy gets much stronger, market forces and Federal Reserve actions could start to drive up mortgage rates.

STORY: Stricter Lending Rules Haven’t Curbed Lying Mortgage Applicants

These charts show how deep of a hole the housing market fell into, and how slowly it’s climbing out. The first shows sales of existing homes, which are the bulk of all home sales per year.

The second chart shows sales of new homes. They fell even more sharply in the downturn. Buyers figured it was cheaper to buy a home from a distressed and motivated resident—or a bank—than to buy from a builder.

The housing crunch has been toughest for first-time buyers. The National Association of Realtors reported in October that only 33 percent of buyers of primary residences were first-timers, the lowest figure since 1987. The long-term average is about 40 percent. One problem: Affordability for first-time buyers, which improved after the huge price plunge, has been eroding.

Overall, though, housing is slowly headed in the right direction. Executives of D.R. Horton (DHI), the nation’s biggest homebuilder, told analysts in November that they are optimistic enough about growth to reinvest in the business, rather than pay out profits to shareholders in dividends. “We would never rule out buybacks at some point in the future,” CEO David Auld said. “But, right now, we still see great opportunities in our business.”

 

 

12-18-2014

Mortgage rates hit a new low for the year

Not only has gas gotten cheaper, so have mortgages.

The average rate for a 30-year fixed-rate loan now stands at 3.8%, a rate not seen since May 2013, according to Freddie Mac.

The average 15-year fixed loan, which is popular among those looking to refinance, fell to 3.1%. That rate is about where the 15-year stood in October.

Rates have been falling in tandem with 10-year Treasury yields, which have also fallen to their lowest level since May 2013, noted Frank Nothaft the chief economist at Freddie Mac.

 Les Christie / CNN Money / December 18th, 2014

Plunging oil prices, due to a slowdown in Russia and other global economies, have been sending investors into safe havens like U.S. Treasuries, said Keith Gumbinger, vice president of mortgage information firm, HSH.com.

“This is again driving down yields and pulling mortgage rates right along with them,” he said.

Another factor weighing on rates: few people are seeking loans, said Gumbinger.

Despite the bargain rates, the Mortgage Bankers Association reported a 3.3% decline in the number of people applying for mortgages last week.

If buyers and existing homeowners seeking to refinance do strike while rates are this low, they can save a lot of money. This week’s 0.13 percentage point drop alone results in a $15 a month savings on a $200,000 mortgage balance, or $180 a year.

That’s not such a bad Christmas bonus.

 

 

12-01-2014

Get Ready for Big Mortgage Rate Increases

A decade ago, the housing market was heading into the busiest years of the bubble. Ten years later, hundreds of thousands of homeowners are about to get a nasty surprise. As their loans turn 10 years old, they will see their monthly loan payments reset higher—in some cases more than double.

The trouble is coming for loans that had such features as adjustable rates and interest-only periods that let homeowners borrow more than they would have been able to afford via a typical fixed-rate loan. Subprime loans have typically been resetting after three years or five years; the more borrowers’ monthly payments went up, the more likely they were to fall behind on their loans.

Karen Weise / Bloomberg Businessweek / December 1st, 2014

 

A report from Fitch Ratings says this problem impends for more than 700,000 borrowers who took out prime jumbo loans—mortgages larger than what Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FMCC) allowed—and Alt-A loans, which went to borrowers whose credit scores placed them between prime and subprime. More subprime loans have already reset than the total number of affected prime jumbo and Alt-A loans, but payments for the newest batch will increase far more than they did for the subprime loans.

Because interest rates are expected to remain low over the next several years, the pain of jumps in rates won’t be the biggest source of trouble. The greater problem stems from how principal payments begin to kick in. Borrowers whose loans reset after 10 years have only 20 years left to pay down what they borrowed. That means their monthly principal payment will be higher than if they’d taken out a fully amortizing loan—or even a subprime loan, which offered shorter interest-only periods.

Fitch says these borrowers probably wouldn’t benefit from loan modifications because they tend already to be paying low interest rates, and loan modifications typically require the principal to be fully amortized. This means that principal payments will kick in, no matter what, making the modified payments higher than the interest-only payments borrowers were making.

With loan modifications providing little help, borrowers have only a few, not terribly easy options: Pay higher monthly bills, try to qualify for a refinanced loan, or default on their loans entirely.

bottom of page